On Friday 01 October 2010 11:37:36 Samu Voutilainen wrote: > In side note, getting Freenet to headlines with this kind of cause > could benefit the network significantly. It needs it to be able to > survive over this attack, though... People getting attacked wouldn’t > be happy :)
I'm not sure whether the load problems are the result of an attack, the recent changes in 1278-1280 seem to have helped significantly. However we have to assume we *will* be attacked on that level sooner or later, and I stand by my original assertion that current load management is fundamentally broken. Therefore I will proceed with it, slowly and cautiously, merging stuff that benefits the network in a broader sense first. However it's not the only attack we have to worry about. It's likely that comprehensive surveillance of opennet could be achieved *very* cheaply. Which arguably means that using opennet is a false sense of security... > > 2010/9/30, xor <[email protected]>: > > Well, it does sound insane. > > Insane proposals DO appear in politics, but luckily it doesn't mean that > > they > > will get through. And I doubt it. > > No time to panic yet IMHO. > > > > For US citizens, it is time to try preventing this from getting through > > though.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
