On Friday 15 October 2010 14:11:50 [email protected] wrote: > 2010/10/15 Matthew Toseland <[email protected]> > > > On Friday 15 October 2010 13:45:38 [email protected] wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I propose to list all pros and cons about GWT, and add other > > possibilities > > > to this wiki page: http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org/UI_revamp under > > the > > > "Implementation" section (if you prefer to move it elsewhere, be my > > guest). > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Dieppe > > > > > > PS: I started working on a mockup based on GWT for now. I don't know how > > > much time it will take (and GWT Designer keeps crashing here), but I'm > > > confident I can have something basic for next week (and since I mentioned > > > this in an exchange with a potential future employer for my internship, I > > > have to do it faster than I thought, which is good I guess) > > > > > IMHO the key issue is not what library to use. It's not even whether or not > > to disallow users to not use javascript. It's that we need a designer, who > > has no idea what technology we will finally use, to produce mockups - in the > > form of jpeg's, html, or whatever is convenient for the designer. Then we > > need the technical people to convert it into code, using whatever library > > meets our requirements. > > > Well, I'm willing to do the mockup, and implement it. But it's not what my > message was about. It was just to concentrate all discussions regarding the > implementation details in one place. This way, we won't end up talking about > the same issues over and over again.
Okay. One key issue is the Web of Trust. As I've explained this will underlie a great many apps (the new name for plugins). IMHO we should: - Make the currently logged in pseudonymous identity a prominent part of the UI, and if there isn't one provide the means to create one in the same location. - Have a good, unified web interface for the Web of Trust plugin, where you can see all the WoT-based services that a given identity uses, along with their trust list. IMHO we need this to be taken into account in our mockups and eventually in our implementation.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
