On Monday 25 October 2010 11:54:54 pm Matthew Toseland wrote: > Should we link to Linkageddon? It has lots of links and is very often > updated. However many of the links have no description and have names in > jargon, making it very easy to accidentally run into bad things which were > not what you were looking for.
We should include it, yes. Label it with something like: "ATTENTION: Automatically generated, might not be safe for children" We don't have to label it as unsafe for adults because what is legal for adults depends absolutely on the country you are in. > Problem is, FAI seems offline, TUFI only > updated once in ages ... We only really have AFK index at the moment ... > Thoughts? Are there any other indexes we should consider? Should we get rid > of the FAIs? > Yes, replace them with the active link indexes of Linkageddon. We don't want to look like a ghost city, do we?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
