On Thursday 28 October 2010 18:51:36 Robert Hailey wrote: > > On 2010/10/28 (Oct), at 10:03 AM, Samu Voutilainen wrote: > > > On Thursday 28 October 2010 16:05:58 Matthew Toseland wrote: > >> On Thursday 28 October 2010 13:21:36 Matthew Toseland wrote: > >>> It would simplify the build process and enable us to use new > >>> language features if we moved to Java 1.6. The problem is: > >>> 1) Mac OS/X 10.4 only has Java 5. As I understand it you have to > >>> pay for upgrades, and they are disruptive, so most people don't? > >>> 2) It would slightly increase the difficulty of getting Freenet > >>> working on free JVMs. > >> > >> 3) Some users with older installs may still have Java 1.5. How many > >> is uncertain - on Windows they should have been told to upgrade by > >> the auto-updater, shouldn't they? Most linuxes have java 6 now but > >> some might still be using 5? > >>> > >>> Is it worth doing it anyway? How many people run OS/X 10.4 nowadays? > >> > > > > I’ll answer from my point of view, and not trying to estimate > > freeneet users... > > > > No-one uses Java 1.5 anymore. > > I suppose I can call myself "no-one" now... > > I use java-5, I use freenet, and I could foresee it disturbing my > ability to contribute code.
Because you use a PPC Mac?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
