On Friday 19. November 2010 22:04:25 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Ok. However IMHO packet numbers need to be per-key, and it is possible for > two keys to temporarily be live at once (at least it should be, > implementing it that way in old FNP fixed some largish issues).
Good point. 72768a0 is a quick fix, but it won't work if a tracker we've used before becomes the current tracker again. For example, if tracker A is the previous tracker, could it happen that A is promoted to the current tracker? It looks like it could happen in maybeSwapTrackers(), but both callers replace previousTracker first so it should be fine right?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
