On Wednesday 15 December 2010 21:06:46 xor wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 December 2010 08:01:48 Colten Jackson wrote: > > And by reading them we expose ourselves to triple damages when we implement > > something similar and they sue us for patent infringement (versus > > implementing the same thing having thought of it ourselves). Great idea. > > What is our attitude to published literature and patents? IMHO anything > > MIT publishes that is useful there is a good chance it's patented... > > Can you be sued for publishing free stuff which you created yourself which > violates patents? > > If Freenet was sold I could understand it, but I don't understand why someone > could be sued for doing something for free. > Because we (FPI) are a corporation.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
