On Friday 31 December 2010 00:41:38 Matthew Toseland wrote: > We need to deploy a new packet format again. This will be neg type 6. The > immediate cause is that the HMAC for each packet is too short. We agreed on > at least 10 bytes, it is still using 4. Are there any other important changes > that should go in before the new neg type is deployed? > > One thing that was proposed was to record how long a packet had been delayed > in coalescing for. This would allow us to get an accurate round-trip time. > The downside is that if CPU usage is high packets can be delayed for longer > than the maximum - so we'd still need to average both parts for purposes of > timeouts etc. So maybe there isn't much point? > This has been deployed, with the larger HMAC and without any sort of timing data.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
