On Wednesday 19 Oct 2011 16:56:13 Robert Hailey wrote: > > I just thought of another prediction (or symptom) which indicate that > the current announcement scheme is toxic (shallow-first). > > I would postulate that many nodes (perhaps those not traffic- > saturated) would have to intermittently re-announce as they slowly > loose their connection to the network. A rolling effect by the 'good > routes' being replaced by bootstrapping nodes.
Something similar is reported anecdotally quite often. I had assumed it was simply due to the network dropping ineffective nodes. > > Do we have any data (or theories) or the expected (or actual) re- > connection rates? Get some. :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
