On 2012/03/27 (Mar), at 12:06 AM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > I hope to investigate that this summer as part of Google Summer of > Code! Are there metrics to focus on?
The most prominent would be: * CHK success rate from seed nodes should be 100% (or at least no different from a common non-seed node) * there should be no "classes" of seed nodes (e.g. busy ones working & lesser-ones not) There are also less clear indicators: * announcements prematurely ending through some seed nodes * announcement rejection rates * network fracturing/reachability > Would you be willing to contribute analysis, I'd be happy to detail the theory and supply a patch (though both might be more readily available through the list archives)... In a nutshell, it amounts to the "valid" paths (from the seed nodes into the network) by virtue of being traveled by the announcement are consumed by the invalid/fledgling nodes (as that's where they get hooked in). The depth-first notion intends to solve this by replacing the "deep" connections and not the shallow ones that the seed nodes rely upon (and has a strong theoretical analog to insertion requests). > or perhaps even be a mentor? Sorry... insufficient available time. -- Robert Hailey _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
