On Sunday 18 Nov 2012 02:58:55 you wrote: > Wait, we're not going to maintain backward compatibility with SSKs? That > doesn't seem wise... > Current proposal in a nutshell: - Support existing SSKs for back compatibility. - New ECC-based PSKs, programmable, allowing all sorts of things including multi-writer SSKs for semi-moderated forums. - New SSKs a special case of PSKs. - Several block sizes: ~ 800B (fit an insert in one packet; ideal for e.g. FLIP real-time chat; store in SSK datastores); ~ 2KB (fill one old SSK-datastore slot; ideal for forums etc), ~ 32KB (fit in one CHK store slot; useful for forum maintenance etc, and more efficient than a separate CHK). No other block sizes as they'd be problematic storage-wise.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
