On Friday 29 Mar 2013 11:33:40 Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Friday 29 Mar 2013 06:12:51 Paulo Makdisse wrote: > > Arne, > > I really hope that freenet devs think that this is a good time to work in > > the interface. You guys have done an amazing job with the 'backend', I > > thought that now can be a good moment to make the interface afford the > > possibilities given by the backend to a newbie user. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe > > now it's not the right moment and I won't have the necessary support to > > make this happen. > > I also wanted to improve the existing interface, it could mean less work > > (more doable), but it's not that simple, if we really think that usability > > is needed, I can't just make things look better (style) and more organized, > > I must think about the workflow and logic and user intentions and > > expectations, etc. As Matthew said, it must make sense, and that's the hard > > part. > > Be sure that I will try to reuse most of what already exists, and I'll > > consider the benefit/cost of every design aspect (I count on you for the > > cost information). > > > > Matthew, > > Piratepad seems ok for the job. Thanks. > > > > > > Am I in the right direction here? http://piratepad.net/rZ9baDSftU > > This process may sound boring, but it does make the difference in the > > design. Please add your ideas/comments to the Pad. > > Thanks, will have a look when I get around to it.
I've done a bit of work on it, especially on constraints. We probably need more. There were some previous efforts to define use cases... What was high on google doesn't seem to be what I was thinking of... Aha, have a look at this, it might be relevant (it might also be outdated and boneheaded, I haven't gone over it) https://old-wiki.freenetproject.org/UIRedesignUseCases
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
