NowWhat@UG4SdT-TE9QlPhMU-htBbR~GAamwsQKQoxLFP9LqfiA wrote:

> toad-notrust@h2RzPS4fEzP0zU43GAfEgxqK2Y55~kEUNR01cWvYApI wrote :
>> NowWhat@UG4SdT-TE9QlPhMU-htBbR~GAamwsQKQoxLFP9LqfiA wrote:
>> 
>>> toad-notrust@h2RzPS4fEzP0zU43GAfEgxqK2Y55~kEUNR01cWvYApI wrote :
>>>> Is Enzo's Index supposed to block child porn? It looks like a few sites
>>>> have slipped through. If the intention is to link to everything we
>>>> should update the description. Currently it's just "Freenet sites
>>>> sorted by category" (as opposed to Linkageddon, which is "Links to all
>>>> Freenet sites, some are very offensive, be careful!"
>>> 
>>> AFAIK Enzo blocks child porn if he knows about it. He gets new sites I
>>> think mostly from the Linkageddon XML feed which includes CP tags so he
>>> can auto-exclude those sites. However, he is also spidering and so picks
>>> up some CP sites that I don't have and hence haven't tagged. My general
>>> policy with CP sites is to not list them unless asked to.
>>> 
>>> If you or somebody else wants a more filtered index site, take a look at
>>> Nerdageddon. That reads the latest Linkageddon XML, blocks anything it
>>> doesn't like and then generates a Linkageddon look-a-like site. The
>>> Python scripts to generate it are in the site somewhere.
>> 
>> AFAICS we don't want Nerdageddon?
>> 
>> We can't choose which indexes to link to based on their content. Our
>> criterion is simply "how useful is it to finding whatever you want to
>> find". That IMHO includes some flexibility: Categories and descriptions
>> are useful, and unlabelled offensive content is bad. (This is why we
>> don't link Another Index, for example).
> 
> Nerdageddon is just an example created by somebody else reskinning the XML
> form of Linkageddon (sites.xml). My original motivation was to encourage
> people to experiment with new index designs without having to be concerned
> with the actual site collection and management stuff.
> 
> *I* will not publish a filtered index freesite, but that doesn't mean I
> won't help somebody who does want to generate a filtered index for some
> reasonable purpose.
> 
> Enzo spiders, I do not. All links on Linkageddon are manually added after
> some minimal inspection to make sure the link works. Enzo can find new
> sites that aren't linked anywhere else by reading my XML, and he exports
> his own version of the same XML which will ultimately be reintegrated into
> Linkageddon.
> 
> Hopefully, in time, other people will take our output and expand upon it
> even further to create new ways of visualising the freesite network that
> are more acceptable to other kinds of Freenet user.

Hmmm. We can't block Linkageddon, but we could link to Nerdageddon as well. The 
fact that it excludes child porn (and stuff that he regards as "normal", which 
I take to mean "boring") might mean it is more usable for some users?
-- 
Toad, official Freenet codemonkey, back to working full time on Freenet after a 
study break. (This FMS identity is not secure, it is run on my behalf by a 
friend. Look for a signature. I will sign anything important, either signing 
the message, or signing the files I am referring to; the signatures *ARE* 
secure.)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to