On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 11:29:53 PM Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 03/08/2015 07:25 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 8. März 2015, 10:20:17 schrieb xor: > >> I assume you made this suggestion of marking the new API unstable > >> because: > >> 1) you then wouldn't have to wait for me to reply to your review results > >> 2) you didn't remember whether the review results contain any blocking > >> issues when you talked with Arne. > > > > I made this suggestion, because this is a new API and you cannot know > > how people will use it. Predominantly synchronous usage could change > > what people need to use the API efficiently. > > ... > > > So please mark it as unstable (for a few releases), so people know > > that the API is open for change in case real life usage shows up a > > need for that. > > > > In short: This has nothing to do with the quality of the code, but > > with community decision making processes > > Well put - and agreed, this mirrors my reasoning. Tests using the API is > not sufficient to know how it will be useful to use it in client > applications. > > I will merge this API as-is once it is marked as unstable. Maybe > something like > > /* > * This API is unstable. It will be improved in response to your > * feedback. > */ > > ?
Fixed by commit https://github.com/xor-freenet/fred-staging/commit/4dd140d3dcf26f619292688eb4e93e7ebf8a6f56
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
