On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 08:57 -0600, Ian wrote: > The GNU Hurd is a cautionary tale, not a model for software > development.
If GNU Hurd is a cautionary tale, what is Freenet? > As for your belief that documentation will solve everything I have no such belief. > You may also be unaware that in the ideal case, well-written code is > self-documenting I find that assertion to be absurd. Regardless, what I've spoken about so far has been documentation of the communication protocol that Freenet uses, not documentation of the code that implements that protocol. Although both would be good. > I don't claim that we are perfect, far from it, but if you think that > dropping everything and producing vast amounts of documentation will solve > anything, I'm afraid you're mistaken. I don't think that. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
