On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, hal at finney.org wrote: <snip> > Awkward as it seems, why not go ahead and do as you suggested? > Make RawMessage take a PushbackInputStream, so that ConnectionHandler > can read a byte and then push it back before passing it down? > > Would this help with the problem reported earlier that showed a huge > number of unterminated threads and unclosed sockets? Or was that an > internal Java thread/socket problem?
Yes, you are right as usual, I'll do this. I don't think adding a Pushback can be a performance loss considering how simple it is. This is just a case of me being pig headed about not liking a certain solution. I'll put in a pushbackstream there, at least for now. There, done. Everybody try out build 119 and see if that helps the situation. > > Hal > > _______________________________________________ > Freenet-dev mailing list > Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev -- Oskar Sandberg md98-osa at nada.kth.se #!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj $/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1 lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/) _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
