Pete Weisz writes:
ok, `expr` is actually a seperate unix tool and not a part of `sh`
(i.e., /bin/expr). According to the O`Reilly unix power tools
book, `:` is a standard feature of it.
OK, that's good to hear. I'll leave it alone unless someone actually
complains, especially now that Theodore Hong has explained why I should
keep my cotton-pickin' hands off of it..
I've committed a variety of other changes so that the scripts only
rely on what I perceive to be pretty standard features of /bin/sh and
/bin/test; bash is now no longer a requirement for the scripts. As far
as I can determine, they're portable, but I won't be convinced until
someone manages to run it on one of those accursed SCO boxes...
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
