Oskar Sandberg writes:
        If it takes 500 requests to loose a bad node address, it is not
        going to happen at all on the current network. Or implement an
        "artificial" method (as was discussed under the "half life")
        thread of getting rid of bad addresses. I`m not against the
        suggestions voiced if they are workable.

The qmail way, for what it's worth, is to keep a table that tracks hosts
that have repeatedly failed to respond and not connect to such hosts for
a period of time.  Seems straightforward enough, and it's not something
that needs to be recorded between server sessions.

By the way, could the Brit in the room please define the term "duff"?
(-:

_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev

Reply via email to