We (*cough*) should try to do something to make sure bad references are discouraged before we do a release again. We really need things to work faster then they are if we want to get any real testing done.
On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Ian Clarke wrote: > Groan I hear you say - "but we have just done a release!". > > The thing is that even since Monday we have enhanced the code greatly, > and it is probably unfair to deprive the non-JDK public of these > advantages, after-all, we want to present our best face to them. > > I propose another minor release in the next few days (treat this email > as a canvas to the other developers as to whether this is a good time - > re: code stability). This would be release 0.1.1 (since there is no > really significant new functionality - the changes have mainly been > tweaking). > > Of course, a better solution still would be to build the daily snapshots > and allow them to be downloaded - the problem here is that they require > a reliable external server to do the building thanks to SFs lack of a > JDK. I may look-into this tomorrow. > > Best wishes, > > Ian. > > _______________________________________________ > Freenet-dev mailing list > Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev -- Oskar Sandberg md98-osa at nada.kth.se #!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj $/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1 lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/) _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
