-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > Many thanks to Hal and Oskar for pointing out the mistakes in my > key format; but one thing I'd like to defend is the 160-bit key > size. As Hal points out, DSA keys are bigger, but they too can > be hashed again to fit into 160 bits. Huh? You want to take a large key and compress it into 160 bits, thus throwing away some of its security?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE5BHglpXyM95IyRhURAipZAJ9hlQBzF07cIPN9MCJpEB330OHTAwCdEgo3 R1eLI8LxwS4+avUcOBqVkmw= =VgYh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
