Oskar Sandberg <md98-osa at nada.kth.se> wrote: > On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, Brandon wrote: > > My solution to the problem of storing the key types with the keys is to > > store the different types of keys in different tables. So Request.Data > > looks in the KHK table, Request.Data.ContentHash looks in the CHK table > > (or generates it if the node doesn't bother to precalculate CHKs for > > some reason, like no one in that node cluster uses them) and so on. No > > problems with key collisions. > > But there is no reason to have different tables (yes I have read your > later posts, and you make no sense), and it hurts the efficiency of the > routing greatly.
I think you're arguing past each other? I think Brandon is saying keep different key tables for storing the data, not routing it. So a KHK that was identical to a CHK would be routed in the same way and go to the same node, but when the node went to look in its datastore, it would find no KHK-entry (although there would be a textually identical CHK-entry). theo _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
