Ian Clarke writes:
...I was in Edinburgh working on another project of mine -
building up an immunity to alcohol through extreme exposure
Just so long as you brought enough for everyone here... (-:
Anyway, I did do a little bit of thinking about how to give
priority to smaller data in the DataStore. Here is my
proposal:
..............................................................
This means that the smallest piece of data (unless I have
fscked up the math) will always be moved straight to the top
of the datastore, but other data will have to work harder in
proportion to its size...
The math looks good to me.
Comments?
It looks to me like another incentive to use multipart messages (as if
the parallelism and the mixmasterliness of it weren't enough).
Has there actually been a concrete proposal on how to do multipart? I'd
be tempted to work on the code, if I knew what the data was supposed to
look like.
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
