-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > Twofish is not a bad choice for now; I'd guess it has maybe a 30-40% > chance of being chosen. Rijndael would rank a little higher, Serpent > a little lower. I would avoid the non-AES candidates at this point, > unless we just want to put something together quickly. Whatever cipher > we use, we should design the system to allow a change later.
I disagree. There is no reason why we must follow the AES. It is a recommendation for interoperability and security, but it is by no means a requirement. This is not to say I oppose using the AES finalist when it is picked, but it isn't a must. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE5CJKKpXyM95IyRhURAr79AKC5d5EEu0E44n+yPwjFzz0zLg0jUACfXlvq uJPTsU90zEmxetHuQL4yN2E= =tNMJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
