On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Lee Daniel Crocker wrote: > > Yes, you are right. But to a large extent this is what we are discussing, > > for > > internode it is possible to use negotiation and alike, but for data we are > > stuck with the crypto we choose (we can add more with time using a > > Storable.EncryptionCypher field of course). > > Am I missing something, or is this not entirely a client issue with > no bearing on the protocol or nodes at all? Yes, "Storable.Encryption" > or something like it is a good way to implement this, and maybe we > should recommend that; but the existing nodes do exactly the right > thing already, which is nothing.
Yes, that is true. But we develop clients here too, and even more importantly client standards. > > -- > Lee Daniel Crocker <lee at piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lcrocker.html> > "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, > are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified > for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC > > > _______________________________________________ > Freenet-dev mailing list > Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev -- Oskar Sandberg md98-osa at nada.kth.se #!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj $/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1 lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/) _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
