Important was that I moved into the tcpConnection class instead of in the
ConnectionHandler. There were a couple of reasons for this, one because I think
it is a connection property and so belongs there, and another because the
Conduit needs to synchronize on the Connections out stream rather then a local
object in the sendMessage class so that it won't attempt to send another
message while writing a trailing field. 

Also, your version of checking if it was a local connection was not protocol
independent, which is very important to me now, because I am implementing the
testbed which uses local pipes rather then tcp sockets to communicate between
nodes.

On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Bill Trost wrote:
> Due to problems at Geocrawler, I have missed the last couple of days'
> worth of email on the list -- roughly since I committed the bandwidth
> limiter.
> 
> I apologize for the compilation problems with the bandwidth limiter --
> apparently, the kaffe compiler's package and/or protection checking is
> substandard.
> 
> If anyone said anything unusually important(*) about the bandwidth
> limiter in the past two days, please resend...
> 
> 
>       (*) after all, *everything* on the list is important, but some
>       is unusually so  (-:
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freenet-dev mailing list
> Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
-- 

Oskar Sandberg

md98-osa at nada.kth.se

#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)

_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev

Reply via email to