> ...of data between each other. Of course any large node could be
replaced
> with several smaller nodes, but there may be times when running a large
> node is a sensible thing to do, such as when you just happen to have a
> big, fast computer with lots of HD space and bandwidth. You might as well
> put a big, fat node on it. In general, though, I neither see much of a
> need for highly scalable datastores, or any particular reason *not* to
> make the datastore highly scalable. It's more of an issue with a C port
> since that's what people trying to run high traffic nodes will probably
> run anyway.
>
My main point is that I'm really getting quite tired of Travis insisting
that the Java node is some sort of toy thats badly flawed, highly
underpowered, and just around as a 'reference implementation.
Scott
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20000803/7e2a9df0/attachment.pgp>
