On Fri, 04 Aug 2000, you wrote: > This wouldn't be a bad idea. Of course, even with the goals of > nfreenetd, it still would be somewhat excessive to require the use of > a real database. Of course the having the option of using a database > as a back end would not be a bad idea.
I would like to note that the java implementation already has to option of plugging in databases. If somebody wants to let the java node store it's data by contacting a JDBC or mySQL database, all you need to do is reimplement the Data and DataProperties classes (see FileData and FileDataProperties for the default implementation), and it will then take about 20 seconds to make whether to use disk or database a config option. For all your whining about our implementation, it really is quite modular. I could tell you exactly what interfaces and abstracts need to be reimplemented to turn it into a webserver, a bbs, or a telephone switchboard... > > -- > Travis Bemann > Sendmail is still screwed up on my box. > My email address is really bemann at execpc.com. ---------------------------------------- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="unnamed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: ---------------------------------------- -- \oskar _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
