On Sat, 05 Aug 2000, Scott G. Miller wrote: > > > Java native compiler. There are compilers that procude native code for > > atleast some platforms, couldnt these be used to provide binary versions of > > freenet, atleast until stable C/C++ implementations appear, for those who > > dont know and are skecptical about java? Java Visual Age has a compiler like > > this inbuilt asfaik. > Yes, and GCJ just had another release recently for Unix > platforms. Problem is, compiled java doesnt allow dynamic code. There > are a couple of classes in Freenet that are brought in dynamically (the > cipher classes in the client are an example). But yes, 99% of the code > could be compiled, and the other 1% remain interpreted.
Actually all Messages, Addresses, Connections and Listeners are loaded dynamically (Class.forName()). That is the way that all these things were originally made pluggable. Being able to compile is reason enough to change this anyways IMO. Something like what I did with the keys should be fine. > > > > ---------------------------------------- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="unnamed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: ---------------------------------------- -- \oskar _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
