On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 06:33:29PM +0700, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > BTW, Hal, as you noticed I decided to go with your second proposed model for a > hash that can be verified part by part. Adam called it a "progressive hash", > is
I doubt it - I just made that name up because it seemed 'right' to me. But god help anyone who thinks like I do. Hal, is there a real name? AGL -- The Street finds its own uses for technology. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20000807/fed1cca5/attachment.pgp>
