On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 02:59:12PM +0300, Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote: > Brandon wrote: > > > The poor perl and python client writers are going to have to go on special > > diets in order to keep up. > > The freenetlib in CVS can request KSKs, although it can't verify them yet. > Adding support for insertion shouldn't be too hard. > > However, in order to support other keytypes, I'm trying to rewrite the whole > library from scratch. Whatever code I have of the new version will be at > http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/freenet-python once the project is > approved by SF.
Just to make life easier for people like myself and Brandon, can you make the interface as close to the old one as possible (make keytype handling as transparent as possible, specifically)? Yeah, I am one of the other freenetlib programmers, but you are doing the bulk of the work on freenetlib 0.2.x (I've been working on fnclient 0.1.0 and nfreenetd 0.0.1 (no, I don't think that it will be ready at the time that Freenet 0.3 is released) lately). -- Travis Bemann Sendmail is still screwed up on my box. My email address is really bemann at execpc.com. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 1369 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20000814/61838bcb/attachment.pgp>
