> Freenet itself challenges existing copyright laws. In a sense, > we're saying "certain existing laws are wrong, and we're right".
Maybe you say that, maybe lots of people on this list say that, but Freenet doesn't say that. Freenet, by existing, says that censorship is wrong. Freenet, by existing, raises some questions about whether the enforcement of copyright with digital content is enforcable. But Freenet does not, by existing, say that copyright is wrong anymore than a gun, by existing, says that it's wrong to live. We certainly didn't sit down to destory copyright. > approval. If Ian gives it the thumbs-down (which sounds good to > me), then the author can post it as his own opinion somewhere. Or edit it. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
