In a message dated 8/28/00 8:36:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time, bemann at bemann.sourceforge.net writes:
> This is a good thing. It can make Freenet look like some other > protocol. Uh huh, until they try to connect to it. > However, I don't think that netstat would be really > portable. If you executed if from Java, it would require that the > machine is a UNIX or Windoze box, and you can't integrate it into > Freenet itself (there is probably no way to do this in Java). You don't want to start exec'ing external programs. That's amazingly lame. In a message dated 8/28/00 8:43:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time, bemann at bemann.sourceforge.net writes: > Services lists aren't portable. Also, not all systems have any sort > of services list (MacOS boxen, for example). RFC 1060? This whole issue is not a big deal, what the hell is the confusion? -lmh _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
