Thanks all, I gather that no one's comfortable yet in saying "Yep, this is the way it's going to be." No problem, I just wasn't sure about where things stood.
I'll just keep playing with 0.2 code, and not worry about new stuff until it's been in the oven a bit longer :-) D Schutt On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 04:37:12PM -0700, Lee Daniel Crocker wrote: > > With me, it is not an issue of looking down at the documentation, but simply > > that I don't know for sure how I want it until I have attempted to implement > > it. Put it down to lack of experience or whatever, but despite what every > > teacher and book will tell you, I feel much more comfortable implementing > > first, and specing afterwards. > > If that's what you're comfortable with, I can't argue. I generally do > both side-by-side, because each one tends to bring out problems in the > other. I just wanted to report on why the spec and the code don't match > very well. That's pretty typical of an open-source projects where there > are good coders and good documentors, and no real "management" to keep > the two in sync. > > -- > Lee Daniel Crocker <lee at piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lcrocker.html> > "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, > are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified > for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC > > > _______________________________________________ > Freenet-dev mailing list > Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
