Oskar Sandberg wrote: > But it is exactly because such a node does not exist that it won't fall-over. > The Update is not sent to one node but several, say 10-15 to begin with.
Er, very dubious - wouldn't it be better if one of the nodes closer to the epi-centre sent the data to 10-15 nodes the data, rather than your own node where these update messages are likely to follow more or less the same path anyway? This is the core of the idea behind my proposal. Ian. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
