> > However, I'm okay with dropping unknown fields in the small number of > > cases where a node reads a message via an untyped protocol and then writes > > it using a typed protocol. > > I don't understand this. Are you talking about a gateway? What typed > protocol?
I'm not sure what he's talking about either. And handling unknown fields is also rigorously defined in the spec already. And as I've said before, Freenet protocol IS typed: field names are types. -- Lee Daniel Crocker <lee at piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lee/> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
