-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>
> I agree. It would be better to do like the transport, have an object attached
> to the node with newAddress(String protocol, String address) and
> newConnection(String protocol, Address addr).
>
> I have a question for somebody: If how the node communicates is the protocol,
> and if the format of the messages is the transport, then what should the
> underlying protocol used ("tcp", but could be anything) to it be called?
Thats probably my bad. How the node communicates is the protocol, the
format of the messages is just a serialization, format, or payload (I'm
sure there are other, better terms). The underlying protocol, the thing
that phsycially moves bytes, is the transport.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE5HYtzpXyM95IyRhURAkmEAJ4hFxExXaKNSHWRlKgxG9nDH4F8qACfY1Sa
9ihO4ngrUaZhoUrgF2Ei2qU=
=AWqX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
