There is already a Freenet.node.Document, so that won't work (well it will, but fully qualifying sucks). One of those is going to need a new name.
Also, it should probably go in Freenet.client since a node would never do data encryption. On Mon, 15 May 2000, Scott G. Miller wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Okay, I've checked in all the necessary support code for data > encryption. It just needs to be hooked into the client. The relevant > class is Freenet.Document. Enjoy. > > Scott > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQE5IEEnpXyM95IyRhURAn+hAJ0bpNh1eXFG+4bUlYfCYnKsOep3EgCcDUt3 > aTQ8Ieqk3LyPsRt9ygqCkkE= > =uPik > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Freenet-dev mailing list > Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev -- ___ Oskar Sandberg md98-osa at nada.kth.se _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
