>
> Please say everyone agrees with unrequests? (I like getting consensus
> opinion on things, but I hope this doesn't result in paralysis as people
> insist on giving their two cents regardless of whether it slows down
> implementation).
I think its necessary, but there are some considerations:
1) How do they work (obviously)
2) We must be able to prevent unrequest spamming (which is a way of
eliminating freenet data)
3) How do we propogate an unrequest? It has to touch everything the
request did, within HTL depth.
2 can be implemented by allowing an unrequest only if a request for the
same key was given on the same connection.
Scott
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20000518/c32cf853/attachment.pgp>
