On Fri, 19 May 2000, Brandon wrote: > > I wrote the two-level hash classes a few weeks ago, so simply putting CHKs > > in > > is trivial. The issue is getting the stuff that CHKs are useful for. > > We certainly need these things, but the first step is to be able to > request items by CHK. Applications which need CHKs could be being written > right now, without the more advanced features, if we could just request > items by CHK.
"Without the advanced features" (ie without the reasons to use chks) it is just a client matter. The applications can go ahead an pretend that CHKs are implemented. Though I would personally rather that people writing stuff for Freenet (whoever you are talking about) waited until the next release when the current changes to the protocol have stabilized and the use of crypto has been tweaked to perfection. > > Also, making them really useful requires the resume capability I described > > on > > chat this morning. > > True, resume is a great feature. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freenet-dev mailing list > Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev -- Oskar Sandberg md98-osa at nada.kth.se _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
