> > > I still think the solution is to allow "Unrequest" only on reference > > > entries. > > > > How does that address the problem? > > Because the Request-Unrequest-Request flood would not be worth while, seeing > as > the bandwidth costs is more or less the same as a simple > Request-Request-Request (for a non existent key value varying from a targeted > key by only the least significant bit).
Well, I won't argue just for the sake of argument, I am fine with limiting unrequests to reference entries, with the slight problem that this brings the whole reference thing into the realm of the node, where as previously it could have been just a client thing. Having said that, I have no problem with moving functionality to the node provided there is a good reason. Ian. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
