That is why we make releases, people who want to try out Freenet can use the
releases, while we can be free to work on it (and read my lips, this project
will die if we are forced to stop improving the protocol because we managed to
produce and release a barely working alpha version).

If you want my guess at a release schedule, I would say that around the end of
June should be a good time for 0.3. By then we should have any problems with
the encryption smoother out, and hopefully any changes necessary for keytypes,
fallback messages, etc. After that (I hope) we will be able to keep from
changing the protocol until RSA.

On Sat, 20 May 2000, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > Of course it is activated. That is why people who are running nodes should 
> > be
> > running the 0.2 release for now. We have more protocol changes ahead.
> 
> Hmmm, we should take more care to warn people when the current CVS code
> goes out of sync with the most recent release (such as a news update and
> an email to the announce list), and attempt to get a new release out
> there ASAP which reflect the changes.
> 
> As a precaution I will temporarily remove links to current snapshots and
> such like.
> 
> I acknowledge that sometimes non-backward compatible changes are
> required, but we need a better strategy for making significant changes
> of this type which doesn't stop everything from working!
> 
> I know that many people think that we shouldn't worry about the user
> experience at this stage since we are still in development, however we
> disregard our "public" at our peril, an elitist attitude would be very
> dangerous.  If people don't use Freenet, and don't remain interested in
> Freenet development, it won't matter a damn how well it works or how
> clever it is.  I make no apology for pushing for the Freenet development
> process to remain as open as possible, and for the software to be as
> easy to try out as possible at all times.
> 
> Ian.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freenet-dev mailing list
> Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
-- 

Oskar Sandberg
md98-osa at nada.kth.se

_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev

Reply via email to