>>>>> "TC" == Tavin Cole <tavin at mailandnews.com> writes:
Me> Breaking it was undiscussed on this list. What's up with that?
TC> That's why I posted to the list about it, silly.
The way you presented it was as a fait accompli. But, cool, glad this
is still open for discussion.
Not to be harsh, but the impression I'm getting is that this is a
gee-whiz compsci project architectural change, rather than a valuable
change that improves Fred. SHOW ME THE MONEY, Tav. B-) Is there an
increase in speed? Maintainability? Better interface? What's the deal?
We're just barely getting the bugs out of the perfectly good Client
architecture we already have -- rewriting it means, realistically,
another month to 2 months before Freenet is as usable as it is
now. How is it broke? Why are you fixing it?
Also, as Mark's already shown, we can do FCP through the current
Client library. Is rewriting the client code supposed to speed things
up? Make development easier?
Anyways, I'm just a little concerned about checking in a change like
"gut Client" into the 0.3 branch.
My 0.3 cents,
~Mr. Bad
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mr. Bad <mr.bad at pigdog.org> | Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/
freenet:MSK at SSK@u1AntQcZ81Y4c2tJKd1M87cZvPoQAge/pigdog+journal//
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
