> It is significantly more complicated to do calendar-based date > calculations than to use seconds since the epoch. Every reasonable > programming language has a one line call to get seconds since the > epoch. Additionally, as I said before, it's easy to enumerate through a > bunch of dates. I've already implemented both approaches in Java and > seconds since the epoch is way easier.
Alright alright... you're the boss... ;-) > So prefix-date-number. "date-number" = the number? Or was "date" a literal? (It isn't really important since you'll hide it in the KeyIndexClient anyway, but I'm curious.) -Stefan _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
