> This is real-client side metadata right? What I call DMI? If so, go > for it. I'm cool with RDF and XML. In fact, I would have thought you > would have hated RDF.
Yes, I think we should use RDF for DMI. More specifically, I think that Redirect messages should be merged with Info messages and then we should use RDF for these. A quick summary of RDF: You have a URL and then some key-value pairs describing that URL. So RDF is useful when you've got a file that contains metadata describing the contents of another file. If we take the metadata out of files and put it in control documents, then that is exactly what we have. So the plan would be that you put all of the metadata in RDF files that point to the CHK. An RDF file can also replace redirects and mapfiles. A
