> I'm personally a little irritated with you appointing yourself the > policeman of Freenet. Censorship and monitoring sucks, period.
I'm pretty happy when people attack Freenet, at least at this point. On the one hand, I want to get some files sometimes. On the other hand, I think it's worth breaking stuff if you can show that it can be broken. If people were attacking Freenet and not telling us about it then I'd be annoyed. But if someone wants to announce that they're going to attack Freenet and then do it and then tell us the results, then I say go for it! And while they're at it, they might as well attack content that they personally find bad because, hey, extra perk for them in exchange for taking the trouble to attack Freenet. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From devl-admin at freenetproject.org Wed Apr 11 05:17:07 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA32252 for <danello at danky.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 05:17:06 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025CC581F8; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 01:59:05 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from priss.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us (priss.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us [216.103.68.5]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53DD581AD for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 01:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
