> lso, remember that there is no such thing as getting rid of KSKs. They > are just signed data with a publicly known private keys - if we want the > option of having signed data with privately held public keys, we have to > accept them. We could possibly try to discourage them by making it easier > to overwrite data, but it is not sure whether that would make the > situation better or worse... >
Wouldn't making KSKs easy to overwrite seriously compromise the usefulness of in-freenet key indices (given these indices live in KSK space)? ============================================================= = Adrian Lopez <adrian2 at caribe.net> ========================= = if (ideals != reality) return frustration; ================ ============================================================= _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Sun Apr 15 14:51:01 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA27733 for <danello at danky.com>; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 05:30:27 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BD258090; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 02:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from ruthenium (ruthenium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.138]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3088C57D9C for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 02:11:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [213.122.66.74] (helo=zen) by ruthenium with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #83) id 14oiTu-0003WL-00 for devl at freenetproject.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 10:06:06 +0100 Received: from agl by zen with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 14oiiU-0004f8-00 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 10:21:10 +0100 From: Adam Langley <[email protected]> To: devl at freenetproject.org Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] YAPFTUS (yet another proposal for the URI standard) Message-ID: <20010415102110.A17849 at linuxpower.org> References: <20010415022110.W4984 at niss> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <20010415022110.W4984 at niss>; from tavin at mailandnews.com on Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 02:21:10AM -0400 X-Mailer: Why do *you* want to know?? Sender: devl-admin at freenetproject.org Errors-To: devl-admin at freenetproject.org X-BeenThere: devl at freenetproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.3 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: devl at freenetproject.org List-Help: <mailto:devl-request at freenetproject.org?subject=help> List-Post: <mailto:devl at freenetproject.org> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl>, <mailto:devl-request at freenetproject.org?subject=subscribe> List-Id: Discussion of information related to Freenet development <devl.freenetproject.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl>, <mailto:devl-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 10:21:10 +0100 X-Mozilla-Status: 8011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-UIDL: 3ad9f37d0000000b Status: O Content-Length: 797 Lines: 32 --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've given up with all this stuff. We'll just end up redoing it close to 1.0 AGL --=20 90% of generation[x] will always think that generation[x+2] are too liberal. --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjrZaAYACgkQzaVS3yy2PWDBMQCgnXi1BLuJAHs8cTCfcCIbS1lb NxoAoLImhivx9SuoVZe1NxSNeb/Jn3c5 =qCe0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd-- _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Sun Apr 15 14:51:07 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA29517 for <danello at danky.com>; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 11:44:29 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC3158087; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 08:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from azrael.dyn.cheapnet.net (cs2745-29.austin.rr.com [24.27.45.29]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E059557D9C for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 08:25:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 26101 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Apr 2001 15:22:39 -0000 To: devl at freenetproject.org Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] FCP versus XML-RPC References: <011701c0c475$e0f16cb0$fb7637d2 at private> From: Steven Hazel <[email protected]> In-Reply-To: "David McNab"'s message of "Sat, 14 Apr 2001 12:00:12 +1200"
