On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 10:35:06PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > That's unrelated to my point. My point is that if you add filtering then > you lose safe harbor status.
This is pseudo-lawyering, which is dangerous. As has been demonstrated with Napster (who didn't filter anything), whether you currently filter something or not, if it is on the WWW, you can be shut down. The correct solution is to put it on Freenet. In the mean time, there is no advantage in denying people the opportunity to not be exposed to keys which they may find offensive. Ian.
