> through the system. My understanding is that each server has a catalog, > which can be fetched by request; for this to work, servers have to treat > catalogs as different from other data
You don't understand the system at all then. Read http://freenetproject.org/in-freenet-keyindex.html. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Fri Apr 20 11:46:59 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA25325 for <danello at danky.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:07:52 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F5558013; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 10:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5C38B57D97; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 10:48:05 -0700 (PDT) To: devl at freenetproject.org Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Crisis - Freenet Reliability and Performance Message-ID: <20010419104805.A20341 at freenetproject.org> References: <002a01c0c8bc$af7f0d40$eb7436d2 at private> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <002a01c0c8bc$af7f0d40$eb7436d2 at private>; from david at rebirthing.co.nz on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:37:08PM +1200 From: [email protected] (Ian Clarke) Sender: devl-admin at freenetproject.org Errors-To: devl-admin at freenetproject.org X-BeenThere: devl at freenetproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.3 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: devl at freenetproject.org List-Help: <mailto:devl-request at freenetproject.org?subject=help> List-Post: <mailto:devl at freenetproject.org> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl>, <mailto:devl-request at freenetproject.org?subject=subscribe> List-Id: Discussion of information related to Freenet development <devl.freenetproject.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl>, <mailto:devl-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 10:48:05 -0700 X-Mozilla-Status: 8011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-UIDL: 3adbdd6c000000fa Status: O Content-Length: 1295 Lines: 42 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:37:08PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > "Houston, we have a problem..." >=20 > Freenet's reliability and performance have been suffering terribly at pre= sent. I have observed the opposite. I suspect that the problem may be that your Freenet node will only become efficient at finding information if requests are frequently made from it, or if it has been around long enough that requests tend to get routed through it. I set up a new freenet node on a completely fresh machine just yesterday, and while initially requests were slow (but eventually successful), they got faster with time as my node learned more about the network topology. Ian. --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE63yTVQtgxRWSmsqwRAslQAJ9HCuQIJbdSwwvhp9MiXFB0ClVrCwCeJ9Ky YKnUMxzyfDf3BKeOjuvWqxI= =4AT0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH-- _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Fri Apr 20 11:47:02 2001
