> > Whoa, 50? Isn't that a bit excessive? > > Not if people want to be able to retrieve anything other than the 'standard' > stuff like GJ's website. > IMO even 50 is a tad light - still fails with a significant percentage of > newly inserted keys.
However, if a consensus or majority of project admins wants a lower value, I'll abide by that. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David McNab" <[email protected]> To: <devl at freenetproject.org> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 9:00 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] New Windows 0.3.8.1 installer > > Whoa, 50? Isn't that a bit excessive? > > Not if people want to be able to retrieve anything other than the 'standard' > stuff like GJ's website. > IMO even 50 is a tad light - still fails with a significant percentage of > newly inserted keys. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Benjamin Coates" <coates at windmail.net> > To: <devl at freenetproject.org> > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 8:55 PM > Subject: RE: [freenet-devl] New Windows 0.3.8.1 installer > > > > >From "David McNab" > > > > >Dear Sebastian and FN admins, > > >
