Just wondering whether a reverse SSK could be useful for mailboxes. Basically a subspace that anyone can post to - but only one person can request from. Freenet would handle the sequential message numbering.
David _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Sat Apr 21 18:03:52 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA00468 for <danello at danky.com>; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 20:27:02 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAE9580A2; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from moe.cc.utexas.edu (moe.cc.utexas.edu [128.83.42.2]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C408580A1 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:07:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (blanu at localhost) by moe.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/cc-uts-client-1.11) with ESMTP id TAA30243 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 19:02:13 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: moe.cc.utexas.edu: blanu owned process doing -bs From: Brandon <[email protected]> X-X-Sender: <blanu at moe.cc.utexas.edu> To: <devl at freenetproject.org> Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Reverse SSK? In-Reply-To: <01042109560203.00768 at workshop> Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.33.0104201901370.29611-100000 at moe.cc.utexas.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: devl-admin at freenetproject.org Errors-To: devl-admin at freenetproject.org X-BeenThere: devl at freenetproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.3 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: devl at freenetproject.org
