> When viewed in the context of most other well-written Java packages, > Freenet is certainly the oddball. We have a consolidated Javadoc tree > available at http://ariel.w3.org/javadoc/ in which this is clearly > visible. It's not particularly attractive for developers working > with Freenet as a modular rather than a monolithic entity.
Is there someone in the universe using Freenet as a module rather than a monolithic entity? I'd be interested in hearing about this. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Tue Apr 24 21:39:01 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA07556 for <danello at danky.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 20:07:06 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B91258054; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
